<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Ways To Produce a Web Story Better Than The NYT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/12/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 Ways To Produce a Web Story Better Than The NYT. Solid critique and advice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 Ways To Produce a Web Story Better Than The NYT. Solid critique and advice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/12/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Sensible points - but with regard to the fourth one, I&#039;d guess that the NYT might be a little wary, for a number of reasons, about putting in YouTube videos with big &quot;ABC&quot; logos at the bottom of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensible points &#8211; but with regard to the fourth one, I&#8217;d guess that the NYT might be a little wary, for a number of reasons, about putting in YouTube videos with big &#8220;ABC&#8221; logos at the bottom of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Belam</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Belam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/12/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>The NYT are certainly doing a lot right on the web though - as far as social media sites like Digg etc are concerned, the NYT is the Internet newspaper of record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT are certainly doing a lot right on the web though &#8211; as far as social media sites like Digg etc are concerned, the NYT is the Internet newspaper of record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/12/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Jeff. You&#039;re right. There is plenty of room for all kinds of stories on the web. However, I believe this story in particular could definitely  use a more visual element to help complement the long-form article. I love reading the beginning of these stories, but it&#039;s rare online I can make it through the whole thing. I think I&#039;m likely not alone. I do think these suggestions could get people through a longer story more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Jeff. You&#8217;re right. There is plenty of room for all kinds of stories on the web. However, I believe this story in particular could definitely  use a more visual element to help complement the long-form article. I love reading the beginning of these stories, but it&#8217;s rare online I can make it through the whole thing. I think I&#8217;m likely not alone. I do think these suggestions could get people through a longer story more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/14/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/09/12/4-ways-to-produce-a-web-story-better-than-the-nyt/#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>I disagree with this post. What you&#039;re describing seems to me to be actually a different kind of journalism *writing*, not just journalism production. You&#039;re advocating a blog-style, quick-hit scannable article. What the NYT does, and does well, is prose-style, long-form articles with far more depth than the typical blog article provides. They are different beasts.

There&#039;s room for both kinds of articles on the web, but one does not supercede the other, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with this post. What you&#8217;re describing seems to me to be actually a different kind of journalism *writing*, not just journalism production. You&#8217;re advocating a blog-style, quick-hit scannable article. What the NYT does, and does well, is prose-style, long-form articles with far more depth than the typical blog article provides. They are different beasts.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s room for both kinds of articles on the web, but one does not supercede the other, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

