<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full RSS feeds kick the crap out of partial feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>It really doesn&#039;t matter if websites display full RSS feeds or not.  With WizardRSS.com you can type in the URL of the partial feeds and they will forward you to a new URL where you can get the link to the full RSS feeds.

I have seen a ton of people using their service.  Plus, I have never run across a website like WizardRSS.com that actually lets you get the full feed from any website on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter if websites display full RSS feeds or not.  With WizardRSS.com you can type in the URL of the partial feeds and they will forward you to a new URL where you can get the link to the full RSS feeds.</p>
<p>I have seen a ton of people using their service.  Plus, I have never run across a website like WizardRSS.com that actually lets you get the full feed from any website on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rss Reader For Mlive.Com - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rss Reader For Mlive.Com - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] MI - 1 ...      www.pageflakes.com/NathanZhang01x/14097490/  [Found on Yahoo! Search]     63.  Full RSS feeds kick the crap out of partial feeds &#124; New Media Bytes ...    The debate of serving full vs. partial RSS feeds isn&#039;t a ... As a reader and an editor who does [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] MI &#8211; 1 &#8230;      <a href="http://www.pageflakes.com/NathanZhang01x/14097490/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pageflakes.com/NathanZhang01x/14097490/</a>  [Found on Yahoo! Search]     63.  Full RSS feeds kick the crap out of partial feeds | New Media Bytes &#8230;    The debate of serving full vs. partial RSS feeds isn&#8217;t a &#8230; As a reader and an editor who does [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/#comment-507</guid>
		<description>We have gone back and forth between partial and full feeds, and there&#039;s one factor you haven&#039;t considered. For popular, easy-to-monetize niches, full feeds often result in your content showing up on &quot;splogs&quot; minutes after you publish. These are automated blogs that are set up to steal content and publish it with contextual advertising on the side. There are networks of these things containing hundreds of splogs apiece. You find yourself competing with your own content.

Although for our readers&#039; sakes we&#039;ve always preferred full feeds, the constant waste of staff time in tracking down ISPs and issuing DMCA notifications makes partial feeds much less of a hassle.

At the moment we&#039;re offering a full feed because that&#039;s what Amazon needs for Kindle, but if we have another splog outbreak, we&#039;ll have to figure out if we can make a hidden RSS feed for Amazon and go back to partial feeds.

If Google Reader would support password protected feeds, that would help, for a while at least, until sploggers start to manually search for passwords.

As a reader and an editor who does research in Google Reader, I&#039;m not bothered by partial feeds if the posts are tightly written with a top graf that tells you what the gist of the post is. We write this way anyway, because we&#039;re in Google News, and our ranking depends on a clear, explicit, keyword-filled first paragraph. With a clear, non-clever, non-cryptic top paragraph, the reader can judge if the click-through is worth it, and isn&#039;t pissed off by clicking through to something he isn&#039;t interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have gone back and forth between partial and full feeds, and there&#8217;s one factor you haven&#8217;t considered. For popular, easy-to-monetize niches, full feeds often result in your content showing up on &#8220;splogs&#8221; minutes after you publish. These are automated blogs that are set up to steal content and publish it with contextual advertising on the side. There are networks of these things containing hundreds of splogs apiece. You find yourself competing with your own content.</p>
<p>Although for our readers&#8217; sakes we&#8217;ve always preferred full feeds, the constant waste of staff time in tracking down ISPs and issuing DMCA notifications makes partial feeds much less of a hassle.</p>
<p>At the moment we&#8217;re offering a full feed because that&#8217;s what Amazon needs for Kindle, but if we have another splog outbreak, we&#8217;ll have to figure out if we can make a hidden RSS feed for Amazon and go back to partial feeds.</p>
<p>If Google Reader would support password protected feeds, that would help, for a while at least, until sploggers start to manually search for passwords.</p>
<p>As a reader and an editor who does research in Google Reader, I&#8217;m not bothered by partial feeds if the posts are tightly written with a top graf that tells you what the gist of the post is. We write this way anyway, because we&#8217;re in Google News, and our ranking depends on a clear, explicit, keyword-filled first paragraph. With a clear, non-clever, non-cryptic top paragraph, the reader can judge if the click-through is worth it, and isn&#8217;t pissed off by clicking through to something he isn&#8217;t interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoni Greenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoni Greenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/31/full-rss-feeds-better-than-partial-feeds/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Shawn - Glad to see that you wrote this and thanks for the reference. I was thinking of resurfacing my original piece since so many of the people on Wired Journalists are pushing their own feeds and many are using partials at that. And thanks for the GreaseMonkey script suggestion, I&#039;ll definitely be checking that one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn &#8211; Glad to see that you wrote this and thanks for the reference. I was thinking of resurfacing my original piece since so many of the people on Wired Journalists are pushing their own feeds and many are using partials at that. And thanks for the GreaseMonkey script suggestion, I&#8217;ll definitely be checking that one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
